Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'peer_review'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Community Discussions
    • General Discussion
  • Virtual Events
    • SfN Global Connectome: A Virtual Event
    • Webinars
    • Virtual Conferences
  • COVID-19 Readiness
    • Online Learning and Teaching Tools
    • Lab Management and Research
  • Foundations of Rigorous Neuroscience
    • Foundations of Rigorous Neuroscience
  • Scientific Research and Training
    • Scientific Research Discussion
    • Neurobiology of Disease Workshop
    • Optogenetics Training Series
    • Program Development
  • Career Discussions
    • Professional Development
    • Career Advice
    • Career Paths
    • Career Stage
  • Diversity
    • Diversity Discussion
    • International Experiences
  • Outreach and Advocacy
    • Outreach and Advocacy Discussion
    • Brain Awareness & Teaching
    • Animals in Research
  • Archive
    • Archive
    • Past Annual Meetings
  • Support
    • Help Desk
  • SfN Chapters's Topics
  • Press Conference's Topics

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...

Found 3 results

  1. aabdullah

    2018 Peer Review Week Q&A

    Peer Review Week Q&A with JNeurosci and eNeuro Editors-in-Chief Diversity and Inclusion in Peer Review | September 3 - 15, 2018 To continue this discussion on a different platform, check out the discussion post on the new eNeuro blog site. Join us here in the Neuronline Community for the 2nd Annual Peer Review Week Q&A. The forum will open to the public for questions on September 3rd. The EiCs will answer questions beginning September 10th. Related resources: Get a sneak peak at the Neuronline article The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in Peer Review. JNeurosci editorial
  2. A recent editorial by Christophe Bernard, editor in chief of eNeuro, keeps alive the discussion about ways to improve peer review. Endorsement of our work by competent peers aids in improving its quality and scientific rigor. However, a perfect peer-review system has yet to be achieved and the process still remains a multifaceted issue in scientific publication. Gender and career stage may represent a significant factor adding to the potential bias of our peers when evaluating our work. Personally, I have no problems in receiving tough comments, as long as they are constructive, because they
  3. aabdullah

    Peer Review Week Open Forum

    Peer Review Q&A with JNeurosci and eNeuro Editors-in-Chief image.jpg1200×678 154 KB Please note: This Q&A is open to the public. Login is required to post a reply. If you are a current or previous SfN member, use the email address and password you used to join SfN. non-SfN members should create a new account. Do you have a question about the peer review process? Want to know about becoming a reviewer? Do you wonder what an editor does for a scientific journal? Neuronline is hosting a Q&A with the Editors-in-Chief Marina Piccioto (JNeurosci) and Christophe Bernard (eNeuro) f
  • Create New...