Leaderboard

I love the movies: 2001 space odyssey; I robot; The matrix; etc. but in all of these movies the main premise was "What happens when the IA shows self-conscience?... My first thought in that sense will be: We are talking of the same?; Do we face an uncontrolled entity that eventually could destroy us? the answer is not. To avoid that, we must face the problem with ethics, courage, and a clear sense of direction. AI could be an amazing tool for exploring new fields, having a rapid answer to a difficult topic, etc. but I think that AI is a tool, not a substitution, AI can't substitute our thinking, our writing skills, our curiosity. Recently, one student shows to me an essay and said: look professor, I did it with AI and I think that is pretty good and I look smarter than everybody here. I look it up the essay and thought, really?... The student only put the topic, the machine did all the work, and the machine put all the references. The student never read it (but he did the work of writing the question and turning on the computer). We have to find out how to prevent the unethical use of IA and show the new generations the line between the advantages and the loss of creativity... As researchers, we have to recognize that scientific creation is a product of our knowledge, environment, social positions, etc. The IA does not have all these elements and because of that the results could be far away from us.

The first law is that a robot shall not harm a human, or by inaction allow a human to come to harm. The second law is that a robot shall obey any instruction given to it by a human The third law is that a robot shall avoid actions or situations that could cause it to come to harm itself. Isaac Asimov´s laws

From our most recent bi-monthly meeting, there are two things I'd like to comment on this statement above. First, for better or for worse, I rely mostly on this two main branches of the discussion just to synthesize something that can become so complex. Secondly, such a crucial subject - based on how multifactorial it is - can lead us to unprecedented contributions, emphasising these from our local Community. For an instance, I expect that the post I currently share will only motivate my other colleagues on sharing the brilliant contributions they had on the topic back on the meeting I had mentioned. Certainly, I'm not going to establish any conclusions, although, at least, I might get my own thoughts slightly organized on this world of possibilities in order to get it started. Back to the oath - just kidding - I'll start with the positive impacts AI promises Neuroscience research passionates like us. From assistance on medical diagnosis, analysing exams and figuring out patterns, all the way up to identifying authenticity on published papers, AI can compute information on unthinkable scales and proportions... After all, do things that are unlikely or uncharacteristic of the human abilities and do things that are impossible for organic chemistry based bodies, though I tend to avert from these types for thoughts, specially when we see kindness, honesty and other traits of humanity: things AI will never be able to do. Will it? Well…from this considerations, I go towards the other side. Negatively, behind the data shared and reused, the FAIR principles to be implemented and so many other AI possibilities, the same carbon-hydrogen-oxygen beings work at, not doing things as they’re supposed to, forgetting about the damaging - or worse, not forgetting and doing it the same way - that could be provoked whenever the AI (and the technologies in general) are implemented badly. Yes, the possibilities are not only by the speed of internet, not simply virtual, they’re also endless and, pretty much, concrete changes. It’s kind of funny to think how AI is not the problem by the end. But, of course, it could never be created if it wasn’t for the real intelligence - used for the best or for the worse - the human one. What else do you all have to share? (that's not data, LOL)