neuronline_admin Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 In January 2016, NIH introduced new review criteria concerning scientific rigor and reproducibility that affect virtually all research grant applications. In this workshop, representatives from NIH and the scientific community offer advice to grant applicants about navigating the new policy requirements.Link back to full workshop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbeyeler Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 To give a little more info, applicants must now address: Scientific premise Scientific rigor (which includes rigorous experimental design, robust and unbiased results, including full transparency in reporting so that others may be able to reproduce and extend the findings) Consideration of relevant biological variables (such as sex) Authentication of key biological and chemical resources Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abandrowski Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Is it sufficient to introduce rigor into grants or should we also introduce rigor into published work? If so what are the best ways to do this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimberly Raab-Graham Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 I think the “Scientific Premise” is confusing to many, especially students. Below is a link to Open Mike who does a good job explaining it: https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2016/01/28/scientific-premise-in-nih-grant-applications/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in