aabdullah Posted August 23, 2018 Share Posted August 23, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizbicki Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 Thank you for posting this article @aabdullah! There are definitely so many positives to double-blind review. The most common argument I have heard against double-blind review is that most scientists in the field recognize the writing of their colleagues and peers. Any thoughts on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriella Panuccio Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 @pizbicki Like I also wrote in the 2018 Peer Review Week Q&A, I think that with time recognition is highly likely. But what about disclosing the identities of peer-reviewers during the review process, i.e., using a non-blind approach to peer review? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in