Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'ecpa'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Welcome Center
    • Getting Started
    • New From Neuronline!
    • Neuroscience 2022
    • History of the Society for Neuroscience
    • Help Desk
  • Virtual Events
    • Extended Discussion
    • Event Recaps
    • Live Chats
  • Scientific Research and Training
    • Scientific Research Discussion
    • Optogenetics Training Series
    • Program Development
  • Career Discussions
    • Professional Development
    • Career Advice
    • Career Paths
    • Career Stage
  • Diversity
    • Diversity Discussion
    • International Experiences
  • Outreach and Advocacy
    • Outreach and Advocacy Discussion
    • Brain Awareness & Teaching
    • Animals in Research
  • Foundations of Rigorous Neuroscience
    • Foundations of Rigorous Neuroscience
  • Support
  • SfN Chapters's Topics
  • Press Conference's Topics


  • Community Calendar
  • NSP
  • SfN Chapters's Events

Product Groups

There are no results to display.


  • Articles


  • Files
  • SfN Chapters's Files

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...

Found 2 results

  1. Before becoming an SfN Early Career Policy Ambassador (ECPA), I had no experience with science policy advocacy. This is probably why I was surprised when in 2016, while attending SfN’s Capitol Hill Day, I discovered how difficult it would be to persuade my Utah representatives to support pro-science policies. Following this experience, I realized that my advocacy goals would require implementing four principles: Strength in Numbers Creativity Action Perseverance Strength in Numbers Biomedical and basic science research are important aspects of society — few would need convincing about that. In fact, it is one of the last remaining bipartisan efforts. The real question is: how much should our government invest in this cause? Unfortunately, there is not currently enough funding to support the amount of work that needs to be done. Many of us rely on policies that increase resources for research as a form of employment, a means of funding our research, or as a hope that one day our loved ones will have cures for their illnesses. This is why finding individuals to support your cause will not be difficult. But, it might be difficult to help people get started, so here are some ideas: Start a petition. Create a blog, website or Facebook group where people can easily get organized and discuss the issues. Start a club. While at Brigham Young University (BYU), I decided that creating Science Policy Club would be a great place to start, considering we would have university resources to help support us. Starting a club gives inexperienced advocates the opportunity to learn more about the issue, feel like they are part of a greater community of advocates, and become involved. Not to mention that the more constituents you have rallied behind your cause, the more likely your representatives will listen. This is why there is strength in numbers. Creativity Writing letters and sending emails are effective advocacy tools. But, there are only so many letters and emails that you can write before you go crazy. Try something that will stand out! One of our most creative advocacy efforts came in the form of getting people to write St. Patrick’s Day postcards to policymakers. This was a hit on our campus, mainly because it was a simple activity and easy to write a few sentences about the issue. We were able send more than 100 post cards from students, professors, and members of our community. Another one of our more creative outreach efforts involved a photo booth. We took pictures of students and faculty holding signs in support of research while standing next to pictures of our representatives. We then emailed these pictures to our representatives. Action One of your best tools when advocating for science policy, or any cause for that matter, is showing how much you care about your cause by taking action. Our Science Policy Club hosted two successful fundraisers where we raised money for biomedical research through the Ann Romney Center for Neurological Diseases and the Michael J. Fox Parkinson’s Foundation. At these events, we performed a chemistry magic show and sold liquid nitrogen ice cream. Following the events, we shared pictures and a summary of the events with our representatives. In addition to raising money and advocating for science, we involved the community in our advocacy efforts, rallying them towards our cause, which reflect my first advocacy principle, strength in numbers. You can also make a difference in science policy at a state level. Get to know your local representatives and ask them to support science policies. Currently, the Science Policy Club is working with the Utah Legislature on a bill that will allocate money procured from DUI fines to addiction centers and funding awards for Utah scientists working on addiction research. Perseverance Advocacy is difficult. It’s just the nature of the process. It was extremely discouraging when my representatives would cancel our appointments for a lab tour. However, we didn’t let small setbacks discourage us from achieving our larger goals to grow representatives’ support for increased funding to biomedical research. Link back to full article Stephanie Pistorius Stephanie Pistorius is a PhD student in the University of Michigan’s Neuroscience Graduate Program.
  2. Join the ECPA Live Chat | December 5, 12:00 PM ET In this live chat, you’ll learn more about the SfN Early Career Policy Ambassadors Program, a year-long program for early career scientists interested in science policy and advocacy. Hear from SfN’s Grassroots Advocacy Specialist as well as current and former ECPAs about the application process and their experiences in the program. Learn more about the ECPA Program. Facilitators Adam M. Katz Adam Katz is a Grassroots Advocacy Specialist at the Society for Neuroscience. He previously was a Policy and Advocacy Specialist at Research!America. Katz’s main research interests lie in neural plasticity. He received his undergraduate degree in Brain and Cognitive Science from the University of Rochester and his Master’s in Policy and Advocacy from Georgetown University. Ellen Wann, PhD Ellen Wann is a neuroscience advocacy fellow at the Society for Neuroscience. She was previously a PhD student in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior at the University of California, Irvine and a 2016 Society for Neuroscience Early Career Policy Ambassador. Wann’s doctoral research focused on studying brain activity and blood flow changes after stroke. She received her bachelors in neuroscience and statistics from St. Olaf College and her PhD from the University of California, Irvine. Related resources Community Live Chat with Michael Heintz, SfN Advocacy Director Becoming an Early Career Ambassador (webcast) The Power of a Good Anecdote: Lessons From SfN’s 2017 Hill Day What I Learned at SfN’s Capitol Hill Day The Undergraduate Influence: Strategies to Get Involved in Science Policy
  • Create New...